![]() this is some top-tier level middle school mentality. Indeed, it smells an awful lot like Homeworld thinking - ANY variation must immediately be scrutinized for ‘wrongness’ and set upon with the suspicion dedicated to something harmful.Īnd if this was only about a cartoon, I’d probably shrug it off.īut the reality is…. If I had based her on some existing type of gem and changed up her features, I could understand people wondering about WHY those were unique.īut to look at a gem that has no prior design and to immediately suspect that there MUST be something ‘defective’ about her based on absolutely arbitrary features……………… is a little odd, I must admit. ![]() Indeed, not really even a standard Glass gem exists! Seaglass is a gem I invented! There is no canonical shape for a Seaglass type gem in the show. …a feature which, by the way, is merely a small variation of how our mouth bones grow together, and is in no way indicative of there being something ‘wrong’ with you. We have SEEN gems with only one eye in the show. things that make her unique! But none of them are bad. Is she defective?”Īnd even “Hey, I noticed that she has a tooth gap, does that mean something is wrong with her?”Īnd I always find this really confusing, because all of the ‘evidence’ listed for the theory that she’s somehow ‘wrong’ is just…. Is the amount of people who think Seaglass is ‘defective’ based on….very normal (in universe) features she has.Įver since I’ve introduced her, I’ve repeatedly gotten comments on my posts and in my inbox that read to the effect of: “CG is really small.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |